RELACIONES «SIGNIFICATIVAS», RELACIONES SEMÁNTICAS Y RELACIONES LÉXICAS. (Spanish)
CASAS GOMEZ, Miguel. Linguistica Espanola Actual, 2005, Vol. 27 Issue 1, p5-31, 27p
The main aim of this paper is to consider the need to describe semantics starting from the point of view of forms of content rather than-forms of expression. In this sense, the characterization of semantics facts analyzed from the signifier and not from the signified has been considered incorrect. Approaching the issue in this way, as the instances of linguistic relationships belonging to different levels of semantic analysis exposed illustrate, implies an inadequate mode of setting out the problem. From this starting point, it is proposed that a semantic theory ought to start from its object of study which is the linguistic meaning of its constitutive units. Therefore the true semantic relationships need to be established between single meanings of linguistic signs rather than between signs as a whole. Starting from these epistemological presuppositions, a typology of semantic relationships outline has been put forward in which a basic dinstinction is made between a semiotic dimension constituted by what we have generically denominated «ignificative» relationships, which in turn can also be subdivided in linguistic and designative relationships (each of them includes different subtypes), and the genuine significative ones which only start from the content and only establish connexions between the meaning of linguistics signs. The former makes up the true semantic relationships which we have respectively labelled, in accordance with linguistic level where it works, morphological relationships, lexical relationships, subsentential relationships and sentential relationships.
[ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
EBSCO
miguel-casas-gomez-relaciones-semanticas6
ANTÍSTENES Y LA PREHISTORIA DE LA NOCIÓN DE CAMPO SEMÁNTICO. (SPANISH)
MÁRSICO, Claudia T.. Noua Tellus, 2005, Vol. 23 Issue 2, p69-99, 30p
Between Platonic philosophy and sophistic analyses of language, there is a potent and atypical theory that aims to base the knowledge of reality on semantic analysis. This solves the problem of the foundation of ethics without appealing to ontological radicalism. This is Antisthenes’ philosophy. It will be examined as an ancient antecedent of the modern notion of ’semantic field’, paying attention to fragments that show the core concepts of the theory: investigation of names (…), use of names (…) and distinction in clases (…). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Resumen (español):
Entre la filosofía platónica y los análisis sofísticos acerca del lenguaje, se encuentra una teoría potente y atípica que propone fundamentar el conocimiento de lo real a partir de un análisis lingüístico de tipo semántico, que permitiría también resolver el problema del fundamento de la ética sin recurrir a un radicalismo ontológico. Nos referimos a la filosofía de Antístenes, que examinaremos en tanto antecedente clásico de la moderna noción de campo semántico, con atención a testimonios que permiten entrever los ejes de la teoría: investigación de los nombres (ἐπίσκεψιϛ ὀvoµάτωv), uso de los nombres (χρη̑σιϛ ὀvoµάτωv) y distinción en géneros (διαλέγειv κατὰ γέvη).
[ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
EBSCO
emm… amazing